1 Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection, second edition ISBN 978-92-4-155047-5 © World Health Organization 2018
2 Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, March 2018, https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/Healthcare-associated-infection-detailed-fact-sheet.pdf
3 Getting it Right First Time, SSI National Survey, April 2019, https://gettingitrightfirsttime.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/SSI-Report-GIRFT-APRIL19e-FINAL.pdf)
4 Husmark J, et al. Antimicrobial effects of bacterial binding to a dialkylcarbamoyl chloride-coated wound dressing: an in vitro study. J Wound Care. 2022 Jul 2;31(7):560-570.]
5 Ljungh, et al. Using the principle of hydrophobic interaction to bind and remove wound bacteria, Journal of Wound Care, Vol 15, No 4, 2006.
6 Mosti G, et al. Comparative study of two antimicrobial dressings in infected leg ulcers: a pilot study. J Wound Care. 2015;24(3):121-127.
7 Stanirowski PJ, et al. (2016b) Randomized controlled trial evaluating dialkylcarbomyl chloride impregnated dressings for the prevention of surgical site infections in adult women undergoing caesarean section. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 17(4): 427-35, 2016.
8 Stanirowski PJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a bacterial-binding dressing to prevent surgical site infection following caesarean section. J Wound Care. 2019 Apr 2;28(4):222-228.
9 Rousseau T, et al. An advanced transparent hydropolymer wound dressing for undisturbed post-op management of surgical wounds following hip and knee replacement: A prospective observational series; Int Wound J. 2021;1–7